Welcome to the Ruby Slippered Sisters Free-for-All Friday!
I thought for this Friday we could discuss what makes good dialogue and have an open forum for questions and suggestions on dialogue problems. I love crisp, snappy dialogue that keeps the reader on the edge of her seat. Great comebacks are the best. Observations dripping with sarcasm are just fun. One of my personal favorites when it comes to sexy dialogue is Julia Quinn. She can curl my toes with one line and have me laughing out loud with the next. And can we ever forget the line from Janet Evanovich’s Stephanie Plum series where Joe Morelli says, “Nice dress. Take it off.”
Sigh…
And in case you’re wondering, I love examples. I learn by example, which explains my love of them. So feel free to give examples from your own work that you are particularly proud of or examples from your favorite authors, giving proper kudos to him or her naturally.
|
Good morning, Darynda! One of the things I struggle with, and am consciously working on in my writing, is simply having a more effective balance of dialogue to internal thought for my heroes and heroines.
In early drafts, I tend to have way too many scenes where the hero or heroine is alone, thinking about stuff I need to reveal to the reader. It’s a constant fight for me to get these characters into a setting where I can reveal the information via dialogue instead!
Not that I mind writing ‘Lukas in the shower’ scenes, but…
LOL, Tammy. I completely understand. I am just the opposite. My first draft of a scene is often 98% dialogue and I have to go back and add internal thought, action, etc.
And you are right. It is about the balance! I think that we must take whatever we’re best at and weight too much of our mss with it. My strongest point is dialogue and I have to work, aka struggle, aka pull teeth, to get everything else onto the page.
And those Lukas-in-the-shower scenes certainly have their good moments.
Me too! My H/H are not thinkers, they are talkers.
It’s difficult to keep from returning to this device — the “alone in the shower and can’t stop thinking about X.” But turning it into dialogue isn’t necessarily better. I’m sure you do it skillfully, but I do hate it when it’s done badly, like when characters are only talking because the author needs to reveal some backstory or motivation.
Have you heard about Jack Bickham’s theory of “scene and sequel”? I’m pretty sure he’s the one behind it, though he also gives credit to his mentor, Dwight Swain. I read about it in Bickham’s book, “How to Write and Sell Your Novel,” a Reader’s Digest book, I think. Anyway, the gist of the theory is that any work of genre fiction is just a series of scenes and sequels. Scenes are action; sequels are reflection. Or to be more precise:
Scenes are “an active component of the story in which a character struggles against conflict to achieve a goal, often achieving a partial success that only seems to make matters worse. It is told moment-by-moment on a stimulus-and-response model with no summary. What occurs must have downstream effects that determine the course of the rest of the story.”
Sequels are “the story component that follows scenes in which the character who lost the most in the previous scene reacts emotionally, assesses his/her new options, makes a decision, and plots a new course of action, which leads into the next scene.”
So, your shower scenes may just be the necessary “sequels” to action scenes. It’s a natural way to write; most of us do it without thinking about it. But books that feel too fast-paced usually lack an adequate number of sequel components. Books that drag are usually all sequel, no scene — or at least, no real scenes with conflict and downstream effects.
Jamie, this is such a nice realization. My books are fast and I really have to slow them down with “sequels.” But I had never thought of it that way. Why they are too fast and why they are too slow.
Wow. I have totally learned something.
I love when that happens!
Thanks, you!!!
~D~