A Dramatic Reading in Three Acts: Reading Your Manuscript Out Loud

Filed in: blog

Read my manuscript out loud?  Are you insane?  What in the world for?!?!?!?!?

That’s what I thought the first time I heard the suggestion.

No way.  I don’t like the sound of my own voice.  I WOULD FEEL STUPID!!!

And those were my answers.

But in completing my third manuscript—the one that WON the Golden Heart this last year—I was so certain it was close to being a winning manuscript, that I wasn’t about to let anything slip by undone.  So after I had edited it in its entirety at least six times, and was certain I had all the typos and “wordy” parts fixed, I closed myself up in my bedroom, stretched out across my bed and began to read out loud.

(Please note…the husband wasn’t even allowed in the house during this as I was still certain I would sound stupid.)

Upon beginning, I really didn’t expect to change much of anything.  I mean, I had gone through the sucker so many times I could practically recite it word for word!

And let me also mention, I didn’t start this until some time after noon that day, figuring that would be plenty of time.

Wrong on both accounts.

If you’ve never read your work out loud, try it.  You’ll surprise yourself.  I had read a scene or chapter or two in a mumbling fashion, but with this, I read it out loud, making sure to look and read every single word, and also read it loud enough to be heard by someone other than myself (if they had been allowed in the house.)

What I learned was it’s very hard to hear the cadence of the story as accurately when read silently in your mind.  Very hard.  It was just tiny little things, but things that, when changed, show the difference between fairly-well edited and seriously polished.  And agents and editors notice seriously polished! That was what I got from my experience.  I would be reading along and suddenly hit a tiny bump.  Usually it was just something slightly off, like an extra syllable in one sentence, or too many sentences near each other that “sounded” the same.  But I knew it when I heard it.  And it couldn’t always be fixed with a one word change. 

I didn’t read incredibly slow during this process, but as I mulled over how to change the bumps I’d hit, I would easily spend thirty minutes to an hour reworking a single sentence and going back over it—out loud—to make sure it fit just right.

It was a LONG process, and I have to admit that I did finally let the husband come home, because I was up until three-thirty the following morning finishing it!  I still didn’t let him come into the room, however, where I was reading, and I think I might have made him go upstairs, just to lower the risk of him hearing me. 

But what I took away from that experience was very vital.  In the grand scheme of things, I didn’t change the total word count that much.  It was a 58,000 word manuscript, and I ended up shortening it by only about four hundred words.  But this was a manuscript I was CERTAIN would not be changed during this final reading.  By removing those additional four hundred words, and spending well over twelve hours reading it out loud, I grew to understand even more, what it means to polish a manuscript.  Every little tiny word has to be looked at over and over and over again to get it just right (at least for me.)  And in the end, I was very proud of that manuscript, not only with the effort I’d put into it, but with the finished product.

So what about you?  Do you read your work out loud?  Would you?  If you knew it would make a difference in whether you sold or not, would you?  I haven’t sold yet, but I do believe that what I learned by going through that process will help get me there sooner rather than later.  Let me know what you think.

NOTE:  If you’re wondering about the “Three Acts” part of the title of this post, I’m simply playing upon the notion that novels, like screenplays, are structured in acts.  Some people break it into three, some four, some none at all, but for me, it’s three.  If you’re lucky, some day I’ll share my over analytical, completely geeky spreadsheet that lays out the three acts, turning points, and character and relationship arcs, all on a simple, concise, nine-page document.  Definitely a subject for another day, however.

Comments

Eeeek – I’ve never read my fiction work out aloud and loud before! Can I get a celebrity in to do it for me? You know, like an audio book?

Oh, I might’ve whispered a scene or two to myself. But seeing as you won the GH after using this method (and will no doubt sell!), I have to give it a proper shot, too. I’ll be locking my husband and the cats out of the house for sure.

I’m looking forward to seeing what you have to say about using the three-act structure.

Kim Law says:

Reading your own stuff out loud to yourself is SCARY!!!! At least it was for me. I never wanted to listen to myself–read my own work–for 12+ hours. I did let my cats stay in, though, but they seemed to have better things to do!

Kim Law says:

Concerning the three-act structure…if you aren’t a spreadsheet type person, it could terrify you for life :) I tend to go a little overboard :-D

Elise Hayes says:

I’m slowly turning into a spreadsheet person, Kim, so I hope you give us the nine-page spread on one of your next blogs! I’m particularly interested in the romantic arc, as it’s the bringing together of the two protagonists’ journey so that they really are the perfect match for each other (and not just two random people I happen to want to throw together) that I find really challenging.

Addison Fox says:

Ooooh Vanessa – I like the idea of a celebrity reading! Wonder if Gerard Butler is available….. :-)

Kim Law says:

Mmmm…. That would be awesome!

On the advice of my CP, I tried this for the first time with my last MS, and found it more helpful than I expected. It’ss very time consuming, but definitely worthwhile. My husband also turned the file into an MP3 that he could listen to, and he caught things that I didn’t hear. Good post, Kim!

Kim Law says:

Great, Gwen! Amazing how much you get from it, isn’t it?

I seriously can not imagine my husband listening to my MS for me, though. Reading, yes, but audio…no. Too terrifying to me. Possibly if I weren’t anywhere near him this could occur. Possibly.

Elise Hayes says:

My CP converts her manuscripts to MP3s and listens to them as well–and swears by it. Me, I’m the old-fashioned type: I just do the reading aloud myself.

Diana Layne says:

how the blazes do you do that convert thing??

Elisa Beatty says:

Great idea, Kim! One of my English teacher colleagues swears by reading aloud. She always tells her students that if they learn only ONE

Elisa Beatty says:

(whoa…. I hit a wrong button there…)
she tells her students if they learn only one thing all year, it’s how important it is to read your writing out loud. You understand it in a completely different way from reading with just your eyes.

Oh, and Kim: here’s a vote for posting your three-act scheme!! I’d love to see it!

Kim Law says:

That’s very cool to hear, Elisa, that a teacher is telling her students the same thing. I wonder if any of them actually do it?

And as soon as I figure out how to blog about this insane spreadsheet I have, I’ll do it!

Elisa Beatty says:

She MAKES them do it. Sometimes her classroom is full of kids all reading aloud at the same time. Drives me batty, but they seem to be able to listen to themselves, and they do admit it helps.

Kim Law says:

That is awesome! I love a teacher who MAKES kids do the things that’ll truly help them instead of just suggesting it. Of course…all of them reading out loud at once would drive me batty too!

Elise Hayes says:

Break the spreadsheet into parts, Kim. You probably won’t be able to blog about all of it in one go–it sounds too big–but you could break it down into chunks for us. And remember: my vote is for the romantic arc spreadsheet first!

Kim Law says:

Hmm…I’ll have to think about this. The really bad thing is I have character spreadsheets, a couple others that I can’t even think what are called right now, and then I have the massive one that sort of incorporates the big things from each and shows them all coming together. I’ve been planning to work up a workshop for these. Maybe I’ll use this blog as a way to work out the specifics of the workshop.

Gwynlyn MacKenzie says:

Yes, Kim, I tend to read aloud. I have an application on my machine called Text-Aloud, and despite its mechanical inflecitons, it’s a great help. However, nothing does it quite like the human voice and, unlike you, my sweetheart is my guinea pig. I know he tunes it out after a while (his meds help *G*,) but the act of reading it to someone helps keep me from skimming. Being from the NE, I can talk like an auctioneer on speed sometimes, and speed makes glossing easy. Reading to someone, however, requires diction and enunciation—neither of which is condusive to flying through it.

Great post with great advice. You do know, of course, you’ve just upped the GH ante for the future. ;-)

Kim Law says:

You people scare me with reading to your husbands or letting them read it out loud. I just can not imagine. But whatever it takes to get the job done, huh? I personally can keep from skimming while doing this by making the effort to set my eyes on every single word. That sounds weird, but it’s the best way I can think to explain it. Definitely makes it go slower though!

Upping the GH ante is a okay, right? More good books to come out of it that way?

I definitely read my wips outloud. During drafts, I’ll highlight the dialogue and just read that outloud. Doing so, boy you’ll be surprise how many times you’ll stop and say, “Wait. There is no way this Alpha man would say …” Or this banter sounds like two five years facing off.

Great advice, KIm!

Kim Law says:

You know, I’ve never read just the dialogue out loud. Don’t know why, but I just haven’t. I’ll definitely remember to do that this time!

When I first started reading aloud, I felt uncomfortable too. So I read it to my husband or sister-in-law. It didn’t matter if they really listened, just that I felt like I had an audience.

Kim Law says:

Very brave, Laurie!

Jeannie Lin says:

The critique group I belong to reads the pages out loud. It’s very helpful for finding the rhythm of the writing and smoothing out rough spots. Once, when I was editing alone, I downloaded software that would read my words out loud. Sure, the names and places were off, but that actually helped catch some glitches too. :)

And I’m a follower of the three act structure as well! I just hit the third act in the wip and am feeling a huge wash of relief!

Kim Law says:

I’ve not thought of letting “someone else” read it to me. I might try that this time around and see how that works.

I think critique groups that read out loud would be so helpful in a number of ways, and not just with polishing the WIP. Just getting over the nerves of reading your stuff to others would, in my opinion, help you look at the writing as less personal and more of a business, which is always good.

Don’t you love the feeling as you hit the third act? You’re barrelling toward the end!

Jeannie Lin says:

Yes! No more moping and tender love scenes. It’s time for swordfights and chases and grand gestures. :)

My Little Sis said that the last Harry Potter book was so much fun because it was almost ALL third act.

Diana Layne says:

Love the tip, Kim, but I’m with you, I’d never read it to or in front of anyone. I have too many people here to lock them out, though, so I might have to go somewhere else. :)

Kim Law says:

Rent a cheap hotel room for a night. It would be a great learning experience, you would improve your WIP, and you’d get a tax write-off as well!

Missy Lyons says:

Thanks for the advice Kim! I think I’ve heard of this before but never actually tried it. Now I will! I am always looking for ways to strengthen my writing.

Kim Law says:

Hey, Missy! Glad to see you here! Give it a try and let me know how you like it!

Addison Fox says:

Kim:

I definitely read dialogue out loud. For passages of narrative that I don’t feel are working, I’ll read those out loud as well.

I think your post hit on something really important, though, which is how different it is to actually hear the words.

Another trick I’ve started doing is downloading my manuscript to my Kindle. The manuscript is standard format – double spaced, courier – but when the Kindle formats it, it looks like a regular book. I’ve also found that to be an incredible asset during the editing phase because my eyes are taking the story in as a reader would.

Addison

Elisa Beatty says:

How COOL!!! I love the idea of doing that, Addison. (No Kindle yet, though. Maybe next year.)

Elise Hayes says:

My CP does this, too, Addison. She says that reading the text on Kindle really changes her experience of her story–it lets her see what it will look like to real readers (and thus lets her do a last layer of revisions).

Addison Fox says:

That’s what I’ve found – you really get a different sense of the language and flow of the story!

Kim Law says:

I’ve heard someone else mention downloading to Kindle, but I’ve never tried that. I definitely read/see it different when editing off a hard copy. I think I’ll try it from my Kindle too. Would like to see if that produces any different results for me. Great idea! Thanks!

Addison Fox says:

Good luck! I totally landed on it by mistake – I was going out of town for work, wanted to read up to where I’d written and just didn’t have the room to add a manuscript to my overnight bag.

So I downloaded the m.s. and…voila! It’s really been a great editing tool.

Shea Berkley says:

OOooo. I like this idea. I can see that as being very helpful, Addison. Now I might actually have to get a Kindle.

Jeannie Lin says:

Now I want a Kindle! I have a Sony e-reader, but the formatting gets messed up.

I read my ms aloud to my dog, and I transfer it to my Kindle at some point in the edits process. Addison is right: reading the ms on the Kindle makes it like reading a regular book.

I find all those clunky sentences because if my reading falters over one of those speed bumps, it’s sign the words aren’t flowing naturally.

Kim Law says:

Hey, Marie-Nicole!!! Thanks for stopping by :)

OK, two votes for the Kindle. I’ll definitely give it a try this time!

Diana Layne says:

will that make at least part of the Kindle cost tax deductible then?

Kim Law says:

Hmmm…and then all that other reading we do on there, it’s mostly for research anyway, right? To improve our craft. I’m going to have to think about this some more.

rita says:

I read it out loud. I’ve read the first chapter of my GH entry to a group and I’ve set it to music. There is a free program Natural Reader that does pretty good. If you’re looking for a dramatic reading this isn’t it. But it does help you find problems. With the newer kindle you can transfer you work to it and have the man and woman who live inside read to you. This way you aren’t chained to the computer or office.

Kim Law says:

Hmmm…that could almost be reason enough to need a new Kindle :) But no…I guess I shouldn’t. I’m definitely going to figure out a way to have mine read to me, though, to see if it works just as good for me as reading it myself.

Liz Talley says:

I’ve gotten dinged on a lot of things in contests, but never my dialogue. I think it’s because I DO read my story aloud. It capture’s the cadence you need for dialogue to read smoothly.

It also helps with awkwardness on the passages of description too. It forced me to take many adjectives out and cuts down on repetition.

Kim Law says:

<>

This is the big thing for me. I do dialogue pretty naturally so don’t find a lot of issues there, but occasionally I do.

Kim Law says:

Dang! Where did it go?

I was quoting your last paragraph, Liz…It also helps with awkwardness on the passages of description too. It forced me to take many adjectives out and cuts down on repetition.

Elise Hayes says:

I do read my work out loud, but in the past I’ve done so in that mumbling, not-quite-audible way. It’s still a useful technique, even when you’re mumbling, in that it lets you catch typos and other surface-level problems much, much better than reading silently.

For this year’s GH, though, I did a real reading and used this editing session to pay attention to the cadence of the words and sentences, in the way that Kim was talking about. It definitely made a difference–and I caught at least four or five typos that I and my two other readers had missed in earlier (silent) readings.

Kim Law says:

Yes, I find the mumbling helps a lot, too, but it’s just not the same as the real read-out-loud thing, huh?

Shea Berkley says:

To catch typos I’ve heard of reading the sentences backwards. It forces you to read the word instead of what you think is there. I’ll be honest, it’s a technique I’ll never use, but if you’ve got the time …

Kim Law says:

Wow. That’s too illogical for my brain to handle. I read top to bottom, left to right. That’s just how it works. Makes me shiver just to think of reading backwards! I’ve gotten pretty good at forcing myself to see the actual word, though it has to be a slow read through to do this. I’m sure reading backwards would work for some people, though, who can’t force their brain to see the words the other way. So interesting how different things work for one and would be so wrong for another.

I have read scenes aloud and especially dialogue, but never the entire book. Hmmmmm. Sounds like a lot of work, but if it makes as much difference as you say (and I’m sure you wouldn’t steer me wrong!), I will try it.

Kim Law says:

I would NEVER steer you wrong, Rae Ann! I think not only did it polish up that manuscript, but the things I caught are now a bit more noticable in my WIPs as well. So hopefully I’m catching more things as I finish my “silent” edits and can eventually quit talking to myself so much!

It is definitely a lot of work, though, so get rid of the kids and husband and have lots of hours of quality Rae Ann time to do it.

Shea Berkley says:

I’ve heard of reading passages aloud, but never the full book. Wow. That’s serious dedication. It’s a great technique.

Kim Law says:

Dedication…or insanity. Figure there’s as good a chance it’s one as the other. I write 55-60K books as opposed to 90K so that might help me a little to decide to read the whole thing :)

I did read my manuscript, Lily in Wonderland, outloud when I was going through the pre-publication edits because I wanted it to be the best it could be. Actually, I read it to my dogs. They fell asleep. But I was surprised that I actually got choked up with emotion a couple times, which I never had before. I write for laughs and had not noticed the pockets of seriousness until I read it aloud.

Last night I began reading another manuscript out loud. Hopefully I’ll be alone after work tonight so I can continue. The house must be empty of all humans for me to attempt reading outloud. And I can only do it 3-4 chapters at a time, otherwise my voice gets gravelly, but not in a sexy way.

I recommend it to everyone.

Kim Law says:

Too funny that you put your dogs to sleep, Kelly!

You just reminded me of the first time the emotion in one of my stories got to me. I was reading a few chapters I hadn’t read in a while, and I got to the most emotional scene. As I finished it I realized tears were rolling down my face. I went through the house screaming with joy. The husband thought I’d lost my mind. I pointed at my tears, “you see this? I DID this to myself with my WRITING!!”

Good luck on your reading tonight! Hope the house is empty for you.

Elisa Beatty says:

Great story!

Sometimes, I unintentially read out loud (sotto voce), especially the dialog. I was with my daughter at Panera’s once, working on my ms. She was working on stuff, too, and suddenly she looked up and glared at me. Evidently, I was “talking” to myself–or my characters were! I do find it helpful at times, but I’ve never read the whole thing out loud. I can’t imagine how much time that would take!

Kim Law says:

Haha! I can so see you sitting in Panera with your characters talking out loud.

As for reading the entire, mine aren’t nearly as long as yours, Annie, so that helps :) I figure until I’m sold, I’ll do any and everything I can that I think might get me there! Of course, once I’m sold, I’ll probably be just as insane.

Thanks for stopping by :)

Hmm. I don’t read out loud — at least not the whole shebang … but maybe I should give it a try. As of this morning, I have a newly completed MS to read aloud.

That’s right: I finished “Blind Date Bride.” All 90,300 words and 334 pages of it (double-spaced, in Times New Roman). I already posted about it on my blog and my Facebook page, and told the Boyfriend, but wanted to share the momentous news with people who knew what it meant to finish a MS.

This isn’t just any MS — it’s my first single-title length one. My other finished story, the GH entry, is category.

Shea Berkley says:

Whoo-hoo! Congratulations, Arlene! I bet it feels amazing.

It does. Even though it’s only the first draft, and I know I’ll be picking it back up in a couple of days (or weeks) to start editing, I’m celebrating today!

Kim Law says:

Arlene, that’s AWESOME!!!!!

I plan to write a single-title next year, so I definitely get it’s a big thing to be writing category and then do your first ST. Yay for you!!!! Enjoy your celebrating!

Diana Layne says:

Hurray!!

Elisa Beatty says:

Congratulations, Arlene!! That’s absolutely fabulous! Woo-hoo!

Addison Fox says:

Arlene!!!!!

That is SO awesome – CONGRATULATIONS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Addison

Lara Hansen says:

Mumble, mumble, mumble. That is what I do. I have read dialogue out loud to work on cadence and impact. Occasionally I will read a contest entry out loud to a friend who notes the gliches and sticky points. I guess if I ever get to a final edit phase I will add reading out loud to the process.

Great Article KIM!!

Kim Law says:

Gretchen and I will come over and let you read it to us!

Tamara Hogan says:

Midwest Fiction Writers, my Minneapolis-based RWA chapter, does “first ten pages” critiques where the person having their work critiqued reads their work aloud.

I haven’t had my own work critiqued in this manner, but those who have report that it brings an entirely different dimension to the critique experience: if they’re tripping over their own words, chances are good that readers will trip over them too.

Kim Law says:

I’ve heard of chapters doing this. I think that’s an excellent idea. And what a good point…if they are tripping over their owns words, reading likely will too.

Pamela Cayne says:

I’ve done it similarly to Gwynlyn–I have my lovely Mac “read” it out loud. (Yes, it’s in a computer voice but I have several to pick from) and record at the same time, so I can listen to it later on my iPod during my long commute. For me, this works better than myself reading it for 2 reasons.

1) Since I’ve written and read the things a bajillion times, I tend to skip over words when reading out loud and not even know I’m doing it. The computer reading it out loud reads Every. Single. Word. (Even tumescent. Which I don’t have, but I tested the compter with it!) I can set in in a room to read and record, come back later, and it’s done. Multi-tasking! Whee!

2) Since it’s not my voice/cadence/style, I pay attention more. It’s almost like a new story and I can really hear the hiccups.

But yes, this is a *fabulous* suggestion and I heartily agree!

Shea Berkley says:

This fascinates me. I’m trying to picture how this works. Since it’s a computer, there isn’t any voice inflection, correct? Is it a static monotone? And does it read words that are non-existent, such as typos? Sorry, I’m picturing a computer voice that’s really hard to listen to … or is it more like the British chick my husband likes on his GPS system?

Kim Law says:

I’m having the same thoughts, Shea. I’m wondering if I would catch as much with any inflections. I’m going to have to try it just to see.

Pamela Cayne says:

Shea and Kim,

There actually is some mild voice inflection and it reads everything (thus why I tried tumescent!) or at least, it did with my scenes. I was very pleased with hot it handled pauses and grammar and the rhythm of reading something out loud. It is a computer voice, so I do have to concentrate to listen to it (unlike my podcasts, for example), but that works for me because I really am listening to my story then (rather than tuning out, like I do when I read it.)

This is a built-in text reader that came on my MacBook (comes with male voices, female voices, different/comic voices, etc.), and I have it read while recording it on GarageBand. Download to iTunes and I’m ready to go. There may be other programs out there that work better, but the ‘free’ price tag worked just fine for me. :-)

Elisa Beatty says:

Wow… the thought of a computer saying “tumescent.” That’s either the funniest thing I’ve ever heard, or the most surreal. Oh, brave new world!

Laurie DeSalvo says:

Wow, Kim, great post! I never would have imagined it would make this big of a difference. I will have to try this. I have the same reservations you did but what the heck, I live alone, and only my dog would be here to witness my stupid sounding voice lol. You have motivated me!

Kim Law says:

Oh, yay! I love to motivate people. I just think it adds a much nicer layer of “polish” that is very hard to get without doing this. At least very hard for me! :)

I’m sure your dog will LOVE to hear you talking to her for hours on end! But my cats??? Uh…no.

Shoshana Brown says:

I have to read my manuscripts out loud–otherwise my brain will “correct” all my typos so that I don’t notice them.

And here’s one more vote for the spreadsheet, Kim.

Kim Law says:

Haha…you all might regret ever asking me about spreadsheets. I’m a little insane about them. I’ll work on something for my next post on here though.

Shoshana Brown says:

Not me–I love spreadsheets. Perhaps to an unhealthy extreme, but that’s what happens when a science major starts writing fiction…

Kim Law says:

Ha! I’m a math major. And I’m right there with you on the unhealthy extreme :)

Tina Joyce says:

Great post, Kim. Like others have said, I’ve had my computer read my manuscripts to me (and caught bunches of things that way), but I’ve never done it with my own voice. I’ll have to try it next time. Uh…if I can clear out my house, that is. No way do I want them to overhear me reading one of my own love scenes, lol!

Kim Law says:

Right! I do not want anyone listening to me read a love scene I wrote! Just too weird for me.

Gretchen says:

I always, ALWAYS read my stories out loud. I don’t even really get embarrassed anymore…except for maybe when I’m caught reading it aloud in a funny accent just to liven the reading up a bit. It’s actually a tip I picked up when I was teaching public speaking. When you’ve gone over a speech or story as many times as we’re likely too, you stop noticing the actual words written on the paper because you know what it’s supposed to say. When you read out loud, however, you are forcing yourself to slow down enough to actually notice what’s written. This is a great way for catching typos and, like you said Kim, noticing the cadence and rhythm of the story that are lost in a silent reading.

This is a great topic, and one that I think can help people better edit their own work. Great post, Kim!!

Kim Law says:

I LOVE your enthusiasm, Gretchen! Thanks for stopping by to see me!

post a comment


Name (required)

Mail (will not be published) (required)

Website

Want your picture to show up with your comment? click here

 

categories

Contest Winners (29)
Golden Heart (57)
Misc (38)